5
(GIB)
No.3476/7.
So far as the convenience of this Department
is concerned, it would on the whole be advantageous
to have the financial years of the Colonies with
which we deal distributed more evenly between the
various alternatives than is the case at present, as
the prevalence of the calendar year as the year of
account tends to result in our being flooded out with
Annual Accounts for examination and report in the
last four months of the year. On the other hand,
if a Colony is grant-aided, it is, from our point of
view, better that it should have the calendar year
as its financial year, so that there will be a reason-
able chance of our getting the Account certified and
reported on before the end of December and so keep
the Comptroller and Auditor General and the Public
Accounts Committee quiet.
As Hong Kong is not - and I hope will not
become - grant aided, I rather welcome the proposed
change.
ал
Ay. Harding
Director of Colonial Audit.
24-3-
-39
I have
rom the us point
of view, there is no
wean between hand. 4,
while ther
no comments to fer is
are as sited oberons advantages from the preparation of Estimatio
pouit & views in the sarangements Enggested.
As proposed. Tom. times 27.3.39.
Isuppose
27/07/29
departmental reports (88. PWD mesical) with contume
For the calendar year.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.